My latest signature.

[Rev]

" but the blurry thing about Tupac isn't such a big deal, the man has been dead since 96. Kinda logical you cannot find HD versions of Tupac and it also characterizes old skool hiphop a little bit if you think further about it."
BEAUTIFUL

[Gezus]

You don't need HD for a good picture. And a blurry picture doesn't characterize old school hip hop at all. How does blurriness characterize a type of music? It can characterize old school films i suppose...

[Rev]

you dont know how to appreciate it thats why

[Gezus]

Appreciate it? I gave my critique on it from my experience of making GFxs and watching tutorials. Tupac is the focus of the Tag so I just felt he should be a bit more clearer than the rest. Just my opinion. There was no need to try to correct me and say its just an old school touch when there is nothing old school about the picture being a bit blurry.

[Rev]

i SEE Experience lmao
ok ok aight cool lol

[David]

(04-22-2011 09:50 PM)Gezus23 Wrote:  Appreciate it? I gave my critique on it from my experience of making GFxs and watching tutorials. Tupac is the focus of the Tag so I just felt he should be a bit more clearer than the rest. Just my opinion. There was no need to try to correct me and say its just an old school touch when there is nothing old school about the picture being a bit blurry.

I made this picture about 2 years ago in the Gotthard Tunnel in Switzerland, I thought it failed miserably, but when taking another look at it, it had an interesting vibe to it. Still think it was, and I'm just an asshole for a cybershot camera.



Same as with the Tupac being blurry, to me it comes over as if its an old skool picture same feeling I get listening Tupac at age 17 in 2011, because I was simply to young to experience the time of his success. Its just a creative mind spin I had a few posts back, when its not likable to watch it isn't necessarily bad or shitty quality imo.

[Gezus]

I don't care for the brightness on his face either... it's just a bit to bright imo... or is that old school style too? >.>

[x Nadzy x]

(04-22-2011 11:58 PM)Guerrilla66 Wrote:  

(04-22-2011 09:50 PM)Gezus23 Wrote:  Appreciate it? I gave my critique on it from my experience of making GFxs and watching tutorials. Tupac is the focus of the Tag so I just felt he should be a bit more clearer than the rest. Just my opinion. There was no need to try to correct me and say its just an old school touch when there is nothing old school about the picture being a bit blurry.

I made this picture about 2 years ago in the Gotthard Tunnel in Switzerland, I thought it failed miserably, but when taking another look at it, it had an interesting vibe to it. Still think it was, and I'm just an asshole for a cybershot camera.



Same as with the Tupac being blurry, to me it comes over as if its an old skool picture same feeling I get listening Tupac at age 17 in 2011, because I was simply to young to experience the time of his success. Its just a creative mind spin I had a few posts back, when its not likable to watch it isn't necessarily bad or shitty quality imo.

That picture could be used as a texture.

---

Ok, here's a few alterations, nothing dramatic;