Post Reply 
Humanist-Agnostic
12-05-2011, 05:00 AM
Post: #37
RE: Humanist-Agnostic
i am on my knees praising you with my lips to the holy.

[Image: picture18vr.png]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
12-05-2011, 05:08 AM
Post: #38
RE: Humanist-Agnostic
No. To believe in nothing, is to believe in something.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Thanks given by: TheMythOfSisyphus , YaelTheGreat , Djoser , Chino
12-05-2011, 08:55 AM
Post: #39
RE: Humanist-Agnostic
Nice wordplay there. Totally addresses the issue of atheism.


(12-05-2011 04:57 AM)Djoser Wrote:  Please don't worship me.
Yea, you'd have to be a total idiot to do that. Get down with the bobolution.


You begin saving the world by saving one man at a time; all else is grandiose romanticism or politics.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
12-05-2011, 09:03 AM
Post: #40
RE: Humanist-Agnostic
(12-05-2011 05:08 AM)NikkiC713 Wrote:  No. To believe in nothing, is to believe in something.

nothing and something are just abject measures of an immeasurable multiverse. if you want to find a dichotomous partnership that defines existence, look to love and pain.

nothing else exists.

so don't throw me that bullshit.

i don't believe it.

[Image: picture18vr.png]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Thanks given by: Fuzzly Bear , Introcluse
12-05-2011, 09:19 AM
Post: #41
RE: Humanist-Agnostic
But atheists don't believe in nothing. They just don't have a belief regarding a deity.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Thanks given by: Fuzzly Bear , Introcluse
12-05-2011, 01:27 PM
Post: #42
RE: Humanist-Agnostic
(12-05-2011 05:08 AM)NikkiC713 Wrote:  No. To believe in nothing, is to believe in something.

Your rhetoric for explaining athiesm is flawed

The lack of a belief is not a belief. You don't call skeptics people who believe in no ghosts

[Image: Z2tOA.png?1]
[Image: 9wq2N.png]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
12-05-2011, 06:10 PM
Post: #43
RE: Humanist-Agnostic
but if your belief is in nothing, is that not a belief itself?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
12-05-2011, 06:28 PM
Post: #44
RE: Humanist-Agnostic
The belief isn't in nothing for there is no belief.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Thanks given by: Introcluse
12-05-2011, 06:41 PM
Post: #45
RE: Humanist-Agnostic
If it's in nothing, then it has to be in something.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
12-05-2011, 06:45 PM
Post: #46
RE: Humanist-Agnostic
It's not in nothing. There isn't a belief to be had.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Thanks given by: El Mono , Fuzzly Bear , Introcluse
12-05-2011, 06:49 PM
Post: #47
RE: Humanist-Agnostic
so then the beliefe is nothing. Which is something.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
12-05-2011, 06:52 PM
Post: #48
RE: Humanist-Agnostic
Nothing is nothing. It can't be defined. Can't be a something. Can't be anything. Nothing is completely devoid of anything.

The belief is entirely non existent.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Thanks given by: 33 Degrees , Introcluse
Post Reply